The council members agreed to an extension because they were split on some of the deal points, Zanoni said, such as whether they were willing to offer the Robstown and bus services for cost reasons and whether a “failed business relationship” between the city and the county would continue. The City Council discussed the health district in executive session and did not make comments in the public meeting. Those services would be factored into the county’s costs. The bus would be owned and maintained by the county.
The county asked the city to provide clinical services at the Calderon Building in Robstown, which is set to be remodeled, two days per week and to operate a mobile health bus in rural parts of the county twice a month. The city and county would negotiate each year on services provided to the county and the costs.
#Corpus christi radar in motion full
The city would have full authority over hiring, work plans and employee evaluations. That model would allow the health district to keep its state-issued grants, prevent duplicated health services and allow county employees who are within two years of vesting in their retirement plans to keep their jobs for two years, Zanoni said. The city and the county are negotiating a business model in which the city would exclusively run the district and provide health services to the whole county, while charging the county fees for residents outside of the Corpus Christi city limits. “I think there’s a lot of stuff in this proposal back and forth that take great care of the county employees and that take great care of the people we serve,” Chesney said. He pointed out that four of the five members of the court felt the city had made a “fair proposal that just needed some adjustment, and that many of the things the judge addressed weren’t agreed to.” “That’s odd behavior from a city who says they want to improve public health and bolster better health outcomes.”ĭespite Canales’ opposition, Precinct 4 commissioner Brent Chesney told the Caller-Times the city has been amenable in negotiations. “I don’t understand the logic behind making the terms more severe,” Canales told the Caller-Times Wednesday morning. More: Corpus Christi-Nueces County health district to stay intact at least until March 1 … While we have done a good job of creating some framework, this rushed process does not serve our public, and it does not serve public health.”Ĭanales called for a direct dialogue between the city and the county, as well as the affected jurisdictions within the county.
“I vote ‘no’ because I believe that there is too much missing still, too much that’s not addressed. “Any document that doesn’t give us that surety is not a document I can support in my heart,” Canales said during the commissioners’ meeting. Part of the motion was to direct the county attorney to make some changes to the proposal, although the commissioners did not publicly discuss details.Ĭanales said she objected to the city’s proposal because it lacked specifics about services for rural Nueces County and how the new model would affect state-issued grants, the health district’s diagnostic lab and the future of county employees. On Wednesday, County Judge Barbara Canales was the sole member of the commissioners’ court to vote against a motion to accept the city’s proposal for the health district agreement. We’re not interested in them only liking half of them or 75% of them.” The deal points of the health district “have to be accepted by the county almost in total. 18 it only signaled that the county wanted that date if the city approved it. He said the commissioners’ approval of the March 1 extension did not adjust the city’s withdrawal date of Jan.